YouTube using Silverlight

Posted Mar 19, 2009

Go to Steve Clayton’s blog, the Geek in Disguise to get the details.

Follow the Conversation

21 Comments so far. You should leave one, too.

M Sheik Uduman Ali (gravatar) M Sheik Uduman Ali said on March 19, 2009

Its great

Tom.S (gravatar) Tom.S said on March 20, 2009

Whaat? If youtube really wants to shoot itself to leg, it can do this..

As long Silverlight is propietar technology what is controlled by Microsoft, it is not anyway better than Adobe Flash.

C’mon. Microsoft makes sure that newest version is always for Windows NT only. They leave off other OS’s like Darwin or Linux. Currently for Linux there is 1.0 released, what is far behind from newest 2.0 version.

In real life, you can not use at all those sites what uses silverlight because they are 2.0 version.

If Microsoft would open source the silverlight and actually develop it for all OS’s, (NT, Darwin, Linux etc) it would be nice to have.

Joshua Allen (gravatar) Joshua Allen said on March 20, 2009

@Tom: Silverlight is available for Mac and Linux. I have no idea where you got the idea that Silverlight is for “Windows NT only”, but that is false and you shouldn’t be repeating it.

Pradeep (gravatar) Pradeep said on March 20, 2009

Youtube is now owned by Google and highly unlikely that impossible that it will shake hands with silverlight!.

Ben Hayat (gravatar) Ben Hayat said on March 20, 2009

@Tom: You need to wake up and smell the coffee! ;-)

John Graham (gravatar) John Graham said on March 20, 2009

Maybe they shoot themselves in the leg if they would stick to Flash.

Uma (gravatar) Uma said on March 20, 2009

Flash players suck in slow connections! It’s a smart move for Youtube. Silverlight truely lights up the web.

Dennis (gravatar) Dennis said on March 20, 2009

My major SilverLight gripe is that it’s not available as a .msi

Flash is a tidy .msi and a text file to control it’s behavior. It’s been a treat to deploy in the enterprise for years.

Voytek (gravatar) Voytek said on March 21, 2009

I am a little bit confused. Is Flash an open source?

Amour Rashid (gravatar) Amour Rashid said on March 21, 2009

They said .net would not succeed what do they say today.
They said the same about silverlight. But everyone can witness it has achieved in a very short period. What will they say tomorrow?

Ashish Jha (gravatar) Ashish Jha said on March 21, 2009

Nice to read so much info about silverlight. Til now i was reluctant to use silverlight myself but after reading this conversation, i installed it.
:)

teen7 (gravatar) teen7 said on March 22, 2009

what is silverlight and how is it useful for a common student and a developer can any one plz say me

Chris (gravatar) Chris said on March 22, 2009

Google is actually pretty Microsoft oriented… They have a plethora of .Net based projects out there. I would be surprised if they have not considered using silverlight for major development.

AlfeG (gravatar) AlfeG said on March 23, 2009

>>Tom.S said
>>>As long Silverlight is propietar technology what is controlled by Microsoft, it is not anyway better than Adobe Flash.

Adobe is MUCH MUCH more propriate than silverlight

Joe (gravatar) Joe said on March 24, 2009

I think is great. Silverlight has great possibilities, and Microsoft has worked really hard to achieve that level of user experience, keep it up Silverlight team, congrats!

Cipper Tech (gravatar) Cipper Tech said on March 24, 2009

it would be really cool if YouTube uses Silverilght!

Mikko (gravatar) Mikko said on August 11, 2009

@Joshua Allen

no there’s no silverlight for linux dists!

Joshua Allen (gravatar) Joshua Allen said on August 11, 2009

@Mikko – The Silverlight version for Linux distros is called “Moonlight”, and is built by the guys behind the mono project, with some assistance from Microsoft.

Mikko (gravatar) Mikko said on August 11, 2009

it doesn’t support silverlight 3 and drm + more and it’s locked out of Feynman lectures

Joshua Allen (gravatar) Joshua Allen said on August 11, 2009

@Mikko — You’re right. With Gestalt, we stuck to Silverlight 2 so that we could support Linux, and the majority of content out there is SL2, but some sites took dependencies on SL3 functionality that won’t be on Linux for awhile.

Paul Huff (gravatar) Paul Huff said on November 19, 2009

Silverlight is awesome. I’m curious how they are planning on using Silverlight…seems it would be a poor ROI business decision with everything already working on FLash (unless the underlying videos are H.265 which SL now supports).

My gripe is that Silverlight is SOO far behind on Linux. Thats where Flash creams them. For me, I would LOVE to create Silverlight 3 applications to be interfaces on HMI devices (human machine interface….touch panels running embedded systems). That would really help my quest for world domination!

Add your social network profile — we’ll use it to find your avatar. Or, just add your email. That works too.